Ryan Fishback vs Jacob Brumm Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 05:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Fishback vs J. Brumm

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fishback 1 - 0 Brumm
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ryan Fishback winning 2 and Jacob Brumm winning 0. The last match between Ryan Fishback and Jacob Brumm was at the Champaign Challenger, 10-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Ryan Fishback getting the victory 6-2 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fishback | 1 |
| Brumm | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Champaign Challenger(11-10-25)
R. Fishback vs J. Brumm H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.57% (51-54) | Career Total W/L | 51.15% (156-149) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. Fishback vs J. Brumm Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Jacob Brumm has a slight edge, winning 44.14% of his second serve points compared to Ryan Fishback's 42.59%.
- Return Game: Although Brumm excels on second serves with 42.47% points won, Fishback outmatches him, securing 50.08% of opponent's second serves. What about first serve returns? Here, Fishback again leads with 33.27% over Brumm's 26.68%.
- Under Pressure: How do they handle breakpoints? Brumm saves 55.38% of breakpoints faced, showing better resilience compared to Fishback's 50.66%.
- Performance Overview: Over the past year, Brumm holds a slightly better win rate at 51.61%, closely followed by Fishback at 50.00%.
- Best Surface: Brumm's strength lies on Hard courts with a 53% win rate. Fishback prefers Indoor Hard (I.hard), also boasting a 53% win rate. Will the surface type influence the match outcome?
- Player Level: Both have similar experiences on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with win rates of just over 50%.
- Opponent Quality: Brumm has faced tougher competitors, with their average rank being 280.82 compared to Fishback's 447.64.
- Deciding Sets: If the match goes to a decider, Brumm's 56% success rate suggests he has a psychological advantage over Fishback’s 48%.
- Break Point Conversion: Both are nearly identical, with Brumm at 35.63% and Fishback at 35.83%.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming matchup between Jacob Brumm and Ryan Fishback is set to be a close contest given their comparable performance stats. Brumm's superior second serve effectiveness could provide a slight edge, yet it is Fishback's ability to win points on both first and second serve returns that stands out.
Despite both players showing similar performances over the past year, Brumm's experience against higher-ranked opponents and his fine handling of pressure situations give him a slight advantage. Additionally, his inclination to win deciding sets adds to his favor.
With both players showing strong breakpoint conversion abilities and playing primarily at the Futures level, much will come down to mental fortitude and tactical execution on the day. Based on current analysis and recent trends, Jacob Brumm is the predicted favorite to win this match.
Ryan Fishback vs Jacob Brumm Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. Fishback vs J. Brumm H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 2 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:48:36 | Average Match Time | 0:48:36 |
| 50% (15/30) | 1st Serve % | 52% (15/29) |
| 80% (12/15) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9/15) |
| 73% (11/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 7% (1/14) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 66% (19/29) | Return Points Win % | 23% (7/30) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. Fishback Recent Matches Played
J. Brumm Recent Matches Played

R. Fishback vs J. Brumm Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.57% (51/54) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.15% (156/149) |
| 49.39% (122/125) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.76% (353/329) |
| 49.31% (1175/1208) | Games Win/Loss | 51.42% (3196/3020) |
| 50.75% (34/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.70% (127/114) |
| 33.33% (8/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.17% (24/22) |
| 64.29% (9/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27.78% (5/13) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 113 | Aces Total | 487 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 300 | Total Double Faults | 610 |
| 1:29:32 | Average Match Time | 1:15:36 |
| 85.39 | Average Opponent Rank | 337.77 |
| 63% (3600/5735) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7721/13125) |
| 61% (2201/3600) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5049/7721) |
| 48% (1017/2135) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2619/5404) |
| 43% (283/660) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (567/1309) |
| 42% (2380/5647) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5278/13148) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (10/20) |
| 49.00% (49/51) | Futures W/L | 53.09% (146/129) |
| 49% (51/105) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (155/298) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (35/55) |
| 46% (17/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (33/71) |
| 86% (49/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (160/138) |
| 14% (49/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (160/22) |
| 16% (56/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (145/18) |